APHC010358422022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2524/2022 Between: 1. VEGI PARVATHI, W/O VEGI ANAND KUMAR (LATE) D.NO.23- 152, GAVARAPETA, NEAR KANAKAMAHALAKSHRNI TEMPLE KASIMKOTA (V), POST AND MANDAL ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT A.P -531031 ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI MAJ GEN SHARAD KAPUR, THE DIRECTOR GENERAL RE- SETTLEMENT MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. SRI ADMIRAL R HARI KUMAR, THE CIVIL STAFF OFFICER/ASST.DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL (S) FOR CHIEF OF NAVAL STAFF NAVAL HEAD QUARTERS, NEW DELHI. 3. SRI G SATYANANDAM, THE ZILLA SAINIK WELFARE OFFICER VISAKHAPATNAM-2 VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for his disobedience of the order dated 16.09.2018 of this Hon’ble Court made in WP No. 25435 OF 2002, and under Section 10 to 12 of the contempt of the Court Act and pass such 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for his disobedience of the order dated 16.09.2018 of this Honoruable Court made in WP No. 25435 OF 2002, and under section 10 to 12 of the contempt of the Court Act and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH S V SURAJ Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. Pasala Ponna Rao, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 2. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 3. The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 16.09.2018 passed in W.P.No.25435 of 2002. 2. Though the matter posted finally, there is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with, as such, there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt. 4. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. In the event if the petitioner feels that the cause still survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two months. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 02nd March, 2026 RKS