Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30159 WP No. 13567 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 13567 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SMT. KANUPRIYA BHARTIA W/O PRANAY BHARTIA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/A NO B2-103, SNN RAJ ETTERNISA SY NO.146/1, 147/1, 147/2 HARLUR SARJAPUR ROAD NEAR KSRP QUARTERS KUDLU VILLAGE BANGALORE - 560 068.
…PETITIONER [BY SRI DILIP KUMAR I S., ADVOCATE (AB)] AND:
1.
MR. PRANAY BHARTIA S/O PRAKASH BHARTIA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/A NO. S-15 SAPPHIRE BLOCK PRIME ENCLAVE VISTAS AVINASHI ROAD TIRUPPUR DISTRICT - 641 603.
2.
SRI PRAKASH BHARTIA S/O UNKNOWN AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/A NO S-15, SAPPHIRE BLOCK PRIME ENCLAVE VISTAS AVINASHI ROAD TIRUPPUR DISTRICT - 641 603.
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30159 WP No. 13567 of 2022
3.
SMT. MEENA BHARTIA W/O PRAKASH BHARTIA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/A NO S-15, SAPPHIRE BLOCK PRIME ENCLAVE VISTAS AVINASHI ROAD TIRUPPUR DISTRICT - 641 603.
4.
SMT GUNJAN GOYAL W/O AVINASH GOEL AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/A T -5 141, PEBBLE BAY APARTMENT RAMAKRISHNAPPA LAYOUT DOLLARS COLONY, RMV 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560 094.
5.
MR. AVINASH GOYAL S/O T C GOYAL AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/A T -5 141 PEBBLE BAY APARTMENT RAMAKRISHNAPPA LAYOUT DOLLARS COLONY, RMV 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560 094.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI ANIRUDDHA J.P., ADVOCATE FOR SRI SHIRISH KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, FILED PRAYING TO DIRECT THE HONBLE III METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE TRAFFIC COURT, AT BANGALORE TO DISPOSE THE PENDING INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION VIDE ANNX-B TO F ALONG WITH MAIN PETITION VIDE ANNEXURE-A AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE IN C.MISC.NO.188/2019.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30159 WP No. 13567 of 2022
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL ORDER
None appears for petitioner.
2.
Learned counsel for respondents no.1 and 3 has filed a memo stating that, in present petition, a direction is sought to III Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court, Bengaluru, to dispose of pending interlocutory applications in Crl. Misc. no.188/2019. Since Crl. Misc. no.188/2019 has been dismissed as withdrawn, rendering present petition infructuous.
3. Taking memo on record, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19