Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22430 (CHH)

SMT. MUKTA SHARMA v. TAPAN KUMAR DAS

CRMP/1531/2022 · 2026-06-18

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:25079 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1531 of 2022 1 - Smt. Mukta Sharma W/o Sunil Kumar Sharma, Aged About 48 Years, R/o J.P. Colony, S.E.C.L., Tehsil Korba., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Tapan Kumar Das S/o Laxmidhar Das Aged About 48 Years R/o House No.800, New Amraiyapara, Ward No.12, Tehsil Korba., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None. For Respondent-State : None. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 19.06.2026 1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. 2. By filing the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- • It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that in light of the above stated facts, the grounds mentioned therein and the submissions made in the present Application SOURABH PATEL Digitally signed by SOURABH PATEL Date: 2026.06.20 16:25:26 +0530 2 under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to take cognizance and exercise its inherent powers as provided under the provisions of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and allow the present Application and further be pleased to quash the Criminal Complaint no. 222/2022 instituted by the Complainant against the Applicant herein in the interest of justice, equity, fair play and good conscience. 3. As per the status report received, the trial has already been concluded on 13.12.2025. In view of the same, the relief sought in the present petition has become infructuous, as nothing survives for consideration in this petition by this Court. 4. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Sourabh P.