Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2243 (CHH)

RAJKUMAR BAGHEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/535/2026 · 2026-02-08

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:7027 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 535 of 2026 * - Rajkumar Baghel S/o Kunjiram Baghel Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Kanan Pendari, Tehsil Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Tahsildar Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Manish Thakur, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 09/02/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10(i) That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the concerned respondent authorities to expeditious decide Revenue Case No. 61/A-6-A/46/2016-17 within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. 10(ii) Any other relief, which the Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be grated in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Mr. Manish Thakur, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that a Revenue Case No. 61/A-6-A/46/2016-17 is still pending Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.02.10 12:23:40 +0530 2 consideration before the Additional Tehsildar, Sakri, District Bilaspur since 23.06.2017. He would contend that pursuant to decree passed by the Ist Additional District Judge, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, an application for partition of the suit property was moved, but till date it has not been decided. He would pray for a direction to the concerned Tehsildar to decide it expeditiously. 3. On the other hand, Mr. Abhishek Gupta, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State would oppose. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by Mr. Manish Thakur, this petition, at this juncture, is disposed of with a direction to the Additional Tehsildar, Sakri, District Bilaspur to decide the Revenue Case No. 61/A-6-A/46/2016-17 pending before it expeditiously within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction(s), this petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti