APHC010357232005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 600/2005 Between: 1. SMT. P.KASTURIBAYAMMA & 4 ORS., W/O. APPAJIRAO PROPERTY & BUSINESS D.NO.24-5-16, NAMBURIVARI STREET, GANDHINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA. 2. P.PURUSHOTHAMARAO (DIED), S/O. APPAJIRAO PROPERTY & BUSINESS D.NO.24-5-16, NAMBURIVARI STREET, GANDHINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA. 3. P. BHARATI,, W/O. PURUSHOTHAMARAO D.NO.23-10-7, PURUSHOTHAMA STREET, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA. 4. P. SAI VENKATA APPAJI RAO,, S/O. PURUSHOTHAMARAO MINOR REP., BY MOTHER P.BHARATHI D.NO.23-10-7, PURUSHOTHAMA STREET, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA. 5. P. VYJAYANTHI, S/O. PURUSHOTHAMARAO MINOR REP., BY MOTHER P.BHARATHI D.NO.23-10-7, PURUSHOTHAMA STREET, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. M/S NARENDRA FINANCE CORPORATION, Managing Partner Parimi Hanumantha Rao, S/o. Kotaiah, Governorpet, Vijayawada. ...RESPONDENT Appeal against the Judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.424 of 1995 dated 26.4.2005 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada. IA NO: 1 OF 2005(ASMP 1916 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 3 days in filing the appeal. IA NO: 2 OF 2005(ASMP 1952 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the decree and judgment in O.S.No.424 of 1995 dt: 27-8-2001 pending disposal of the appeal IA NO: 1 OF 2007(ASMP 1935 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the decree and judgement in OS.No.424 of 1995 on the file of the learned III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, dt.27.8.01 pending disposal of the first appeal. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(ASMP 620 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in E.P.No. 37 of 2005 in O.S. No. 424 of 1995 on the file of the learned III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, pending final disposal of the first appeal. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(ASMP 384 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased dispense with the filing of the certified and photostat copy of the order dated 25.01.2016 passed in AS No.600/2005 IA NO: 2 OF 2016(ASMP 543 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set-aside the order dt.25.01.2016 paseed in AS No.600 of 2005 and restore the AS on its original file. IA NO: 3 OF 2016(ASMP 1775 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. V S R ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. M R S SRINIVAS 2. P R PRASAD The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 600/2005 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 19.01.2026, the following order was passed: “Learned counsel for the parties submits that the matters have been listed after a long time and prays for adjournment to obtain latest instructions. 2. Post after three (03) weeks under the same caption.” 2. Today, there is no representation for the appellants. 3. The matter pertains to the year 2005 and is listed under the caption „old matters‟. The cause-list mentions that the old matters may not be adjourned. 4. In view of the above, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for „want of prosecution‟. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Dated: 09.02.2026 AG 172 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 600/2005 Dated: 09.02.2026 AG