Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22428 (AP)

Buddha Vijaya v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/18088/2024 · 2026-01-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010356322024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18088/2024 Between: 1. BUDDHA VIJAYA,, W/O.NARESH, D/O.MALLA SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O.KRANTHINAGAR, BESIDE SACHIVALAYAM, DOUBLE TANK, GANDHIGRAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. GANDRETI UMA NOOKARATNAM,, W/O.NARASIMHA MURTHY, D/O.MALLA SURYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O.KRANTHINAGAR, BESIDE SACHIVALAYAM, DOUBLE TANK, GANDHIGRAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. MALLA SATHISH KUMAR,, . S/O.SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O.KRANTHINAGAR, BESIDE SACHIVALAYAM, DOUBLE TANK, GANDHIGRAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, . VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MALKAPURAM POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. V TRINADH, S/O.UNKNOWN,PC NO.1979, MALKAPURAM POLICE 2 STATION,VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. THOTA SIVA GANESH, S/O.BHAKTHI RAJU, HINDU, AGED 43 YEARS R/O.D.NO.71-31-756, KRANTHI NAGAR, MALKAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VIJAYA KUMAR NAIDANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18088/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue an appropriate writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in calling the petitioners to the police station during pendency of the civil dispute, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and against well violated principles of the law and to direct the respondents not to interfere in the civil dispute and not to call the petitioners to the police station and not to harass them in any manner without following due process of law.…” 2. None represented on behalf of the petitioners. The present petition was filed seeking a direction to the respondent-police not call the petitioners to the police station and not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the police have received a call from the 5th respondent through 112, regarding the nuisance created by the 2nd petitioner and others and on the complaint made by the respondent No.5, a case in Cr.No.175 of 2024 under Sections 329(4) & 305 of BNS was registered against the petitioners. 4. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to follow due procedure regarding the crime which is registered against the petitioners. No order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.01.2026. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18088/2024 Dated.05.01.2026 UPS