Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22420 (AP)

R. Satyanarayana v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/21834/2022 · 2026-01-29

Kiranmayee Mandava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010360732022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 21834/2022 Between: 1. R. SATYANARAYANA,, S/O. RAMU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, RIO. D.NO.9-358, AAMARVATHI NAGAR, M.R.PALLI, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (ASSIGNMENT) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHITTOOR REVENUE DIVISION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. SRI BRAHMRISHI ASHRAM A REGD TRUST, CHUTTAGUNTA RAMAPURAM VILLAGE, RAYALACHERUVU ROAD, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P., REP BY ITS SECRETARY. 6. M KRISHNA S/O LATE M RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC EMPLOYEE, RESIDING AT D.NO.4-78/2, LOKAKMATHA PURAM, CHUTTAGUNTA RAMAPURAM, CHITTOOR , CHITTOOR DISTRICT 7. M RADHA W/O LATE M RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT D.NO.4-740, LOKAKMATHA PURAM, CHUTTAGUNTA RAMAPURAM, CHITTOOR , CHITTOOR DISTRICT 2 8. M KALYANI W/O P BHASKAR, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT D.NO.4-740,LOKAKMATHA PURAM, CHUTTAGUNTA RAMAPURAM, CHITTOOR , CHITTOOR DISTRICT 9. M SUBRAMANYAM S/O LATE M RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC SELF EMPLOYEE, RESIDING AT D.NO.4-740, LOKAKMATHA PURAM, CHUTTAGUNTA RAMAPURAM, CHITTOOR , CHITTOOR DISTRICT 10. M SAMPATH KUMAR S/O LATE M VELAYUDHAM, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC EMPLOYEE, RESIDING AT D.NO.2-74/A, YERRAMITTA , RAJIV NAGAR, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 11. M LIKITH KUMAR S/O LATE M VELAYUDHAM, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC UN EMPLOYEE, RESIDING AT D.NO.2-74/A, YERRAMITTA , RAJIV NAGAR, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT 12. M PADMA W/O LATE M KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT D.NO.4-78/A, LOKAKMATHA PURAM, CHUTTAGUNTA RAMAPURAM, CHITTOOR , CHITTOOR DISTRICT 13. M SWATHI W/O MANISH, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT D.NO.4-78/2, LOKAKMATHA PURAM, CHUTTAGUNTA RAMAPURAM, CHITTOOR , CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 14. M DIVYA W/O DINAKAR, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT D.NO.4-78/2, LOKAKMATHA PURAM, CHUTTAGUNTA RAMAPURAM, CHITTOOR , CHITTOOR DISTRICT. RR 5 AND 6 TO 14 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT ORDER DT.26.06.2024 VIDE ORDERS PASSED IN I.A.NO.02 OF 2022 AND I.A.NO.02 OF 2023 RESPECTIVELY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction mare particularly in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 4th respondent in issuing notice under Form-II of A.P.Assigned lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Rules, 2007, dated 23-03-2022 where by trying to evict the petitioner and alienate the same to the 3rd parties from the land to an extent of Ac.03-5 I cents in S.No.242/1 of C.Ramapuram Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Chittoor District, as arbitrary, illegal, capricious and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceeding including dispossession of the petitioner from the lands with reference to an extent of Ac.03-51 cents in S.No.242/1 of C.Ramapuram Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Chittoor District., pending disposal of the writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to implead the Petitioner/Proposed Respondent No. 5 herein as Respondent No. 5 in W.P.No.21834 of 2022, and pass such other order or orders IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 28-07-2022 issued in IA.No.1 of 2022 in WP.No.21834 of 2022 and to dismiss the writ petition as the same subject was filed vide WP.No.28190 of 2022 Which operates as res judicata and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to implead the Petitioners/Proposed Respondents as Respondents No. 5 to 13 in W.P. 21834 of 2022 and all it's consequential proceedings before this Hon'ble Court and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KANUKOLANU SRI SAI SANJAY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. V SURYA KIRAN KUMAR 3. O UDAYA KUMAR 4 The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard Sri Kanukolanu Sri Sai Sanjay, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. 3. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 30.01.2026 SSA 5 61 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO:21834 of 2022 Dated: 30.01.2026 SSA