VIJAY LAXMAN CHAUGULE v. URBAN DEVELOPMENT MINISTER STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
WP/7968/2026 · 2026-08-19
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2242 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2242 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 927-wp-7968-2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7968 OF 2026 Vijay Laxman Chaugule … Petitioner versus Urban Development Minister, State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents …… Mr.Rohan Mahadik with Mr.Bhavin Vora, Ms.Mekhala More, Ms.Nikitha Butty and Mr.Nilesh Lonkar i/b. The Juris Partners for the Petitioner. Mr.O.A.Chandurkar, Addl.GP with Mrs.R.M.Shinde, AGP for the Respondent -State. Mr.Tejesh Dande with Mr.Sarvesh Deshpande for Respondent No.4. Mr.Sudhakar Gangoda, Senior Clerk is present in the Court. …...
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ &
GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.
DATE : 19 AUGUST, 2026 P.C.:
1. We have heard the learned Advocate for the Petitioner. He submits that the Application of the Petitioner dated 02.04.2026, questioning the manner of passing of Motion No. 13 dated 12.03.2026 in the meeting of the Municipal Corporation held on 20.03.2026, is pending adjudication with Respondent No. 2. Trupti S. Bamne TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2026.08.20 13:07:19 +0530
2 927-wp-7968-2026.odt
2. After we expressed our disinclination to entertain the Petition at the behest of the minority group in the Municipal Corporation, which is agitated against the resolution passed by the majority, the learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner would withdraw this Petition if the pending Appeal under Section 450A of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949, is decided by Respondent No. 2 within the stipulated timeline.
3. The learned Addl.GP submits that such time may be granted as this Court may deem fit and proper.
4. In view of the above, we direct that Respondent No. 2 shall deal with the pending grievance of the Petitioner voiced vide his Application dated 02.04.2026, by following the due procedure laid down in law, within a period of 60 days from today. We expect a reasoned
order to be passed. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the claim of the Petitioners and his locus to challenge the resolution, is kept open. Trupti S. Bamne
3 927-wp-7968-2026.odt
5. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed off as withdrawn, on instructions.
(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Trupti S. Bamne