Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22419 (PNJ)

SUMAN JHA v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/21550/2026 · 2026-05-29

Sumeet Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (104) CRM-M-21550-2026 Suman Jha ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana ……Respondent(s) Decided on : 29.05.2026 Date of uploading: 29.05.2026 CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Sunny Tyagi, Advocate for the petitioner (s) (Through V.C.). Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG, Haryana. ***** Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral): 1. Apprehending his arrest in FIR No.172 dated 24.03.2026, registered for offences punishable under Section 209 of the BNS, 2023 (Section 174-A of IPC), at Police Station Panipat City; the petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre- arrest bail. 2. On 21.04.2026, the interim protection was afforded to the petitioner, subject to his joining investigation before the concerned Investigating Officer. Upon a request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, another opportunity was afforded to the petitioner to join investigation, vide order dated 20.05.2026. 3. It is the conceded position before this Court that neither the petitioner has joined investigation nor has deposited the costs, in terms of order dated 20.05.2026 earlier passed by this Court. NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.05.29 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh CRM-M-21550-2026 -2- 4. In view of the contumacious conduct of the petitioner, this Court does not deem it appropriate to grant any further indulgence to the petitioner and deems it appropriate to decline the petition in hand. 5. Ordered accordingly. (SUMEET GOEL) May 29, 2026 JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.05.29 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh