Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29289 RSA No. 2352 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.2352 OF 2017 (PAR) BETWEEN:
MRS NAVYA W/O GANGADHARA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, CHELUR ROAD, IN FRONT OF APMC MARKET CHINTAMANI – 563 125 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SANATHKUMAR SHETTY K, ADVOCATE -ABSENT) AND:
1.
B SREENIVAS REDDY S/O LATE BACHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RAJAJINAGAR BEDARAHALLI VILLAGE, SIFFKAT POST, HOSUR TALUK KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT TAMILNADU-600 002
2.
M R SURESH S/O M H RAMDAS AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, MALAPALLI EXTN, KALLAHALLI ROAD CHINTAMANI – 563 125
3.
M NAGARAJ S/O LATE MUNINARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RAILWAY STATION ROAD,
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29289 RSA No. 2352 of 2017
CHOWDESHWARI ONI CHINTAMANI CITY-563 125 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI G.B.MANJUNATHA, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI ARUN.K.V, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
R2 –SERVED)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 R/W RULE 1 OF
ORDER XLII OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 6.10.2017 PASSED IN RA NO.91/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINTAMANI, DECREEING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.7.2013 PASSED IN OS NO.78/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINTHAMANI.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL JUDGMENT
None appears for the appellant. Matter was heard in part.
2. Later on, counsel for the appellant remained absent. This Court accommodated learned counsel for the appellant to address further arguments.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29289 RSA No. 2352 of 2017
3. But, on 15.06.2026, Sri Chethan, learned counsel submitted to the Court that no objection certificated was given to him on 14.06.2026 and sought for short accommodation to address the arguments and therefore, matter was listed to today.
4. Since there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 88