( 2026:JHHC:22599 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5586 of 2026 ------ Sanwill Srivastava, aged about 52 years, S/o Late Ramesh Prasad Srivastava, R/o Sai Kripa Srivastava, House, Himgiri Plastic Tank Factory, Neemtand Chuttu, P.O.-Chuttu, P.S.-Sadar, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratik Sen, Advocate : Mr. Rishu Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P ------ Order No.05 Dated- 30-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Mandar P.S. Case No.44 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 406, 420, 467, 468 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner entered into a contract with the informant and others as Saint Anne Inter College, Mandar by introducing themselves as Director and Chief Accountant of the company namely Grey Stewart Family Foundation LLC of United Kingdom and represented that they used to arrange charity for providing good education and on the basis of false and fabricated documents allured the informant to invest for laptop, two wheelers and vehicles and made the informant to part with Rs.5,04,636/-, but did not provide the items. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is a Director of Instruzione Edutech Services Pvt. Ltd. and the company of the petitioner has already supplied 57 tablets and 50 laptops to the Saint Anne Inter College and their employees for a total consideration of Rs.22,62,061/-. It is also submitted that charge sheet has been submitted in this case, but no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 19.01.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no.01 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JM-XII, Ranchi, in connection with Mandar P.S. Case No.44 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 30/07/2026 Abhiraj/