2026:HHC:38295 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADSH AT SHIMLA COPC No.1268 of 2026 Decided on: 09.09.2026 _______________________________________________________________ Shaneel Kumar and Others. ....Petitioners Versus Rakesh Kanwar and Another. ....Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? No For the petitioners : Mr. Saurav Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents-State. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Petitioner have invoked the contempt jurisdiction of this Court, alleging non-compliance with the judgment dated 22.05.2026, passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No. 7052 of 2026, titled Shalinder Kumar & Others v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, whereby the Respondents-Competent Authority were directed to decide the representation [Annexure P-4 Colly] in the said writ petition, by passing a speaking order, within twelve weeks, in accordance with the law. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2026:HHC:38295 ) the representation directed to be decided has not been decided by the State Authorities, as no speaking order has been conveyed to the petitioner as yet. 3. Heard. 4. Notice. Mr. Varun Chandel, Learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents-State. 5. With the consent of the parties, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to the Respondents/Competent Authority to comply with the judgment dated 22.05.2026 [AnnexureC-1], positively within four weeks from today, if not already decided. 6. In case the representation has already been decided, the speaking order may be conveyed to the petitioner within the aforesaid period. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge September, 9 2026 (Anita)