Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22411 (AP)

Y. Divya Aiswarya v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/21407/2022 · 2026-01-06

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010353982022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21407/2022 Between: 1. Y. DIVYA AISWARYA,, D/O.Y.VIJAY KUMAR AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, R/O H.NO.3-1, SC COLONY, VEMPENTA VILLAGE, PAMULAPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYALA DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ATMAKUR STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. PANDLA BHAGYA LAKSHMI, W/O.PANDLA SESHA RAO AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O.GOVINDAPALLI VILLAGE, SIRUVELLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. KAMPARAJU PRAMEELA, W/O.SURESH BABU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O.NARAYANAPURAM VILLAGE, BANDI ATMAKURU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. MIDDE VENKATESWARA GOWD, S/O.LATE MALLESWARA GOWD, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O.VEMPENTA VILLAGE, PAMULAPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in pressurizing the petitioner to handover the possession of land of an extent Ac.3-69 cents in Sy.No.51-2, situated at Krishnapuram village, Atmakuru Mandal, Kurnool District to the respondents 4 to 6 and in pressurizing the petitioner to withdraw civil cases and cases pending before Revenue Authorities as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 21 and 300-A of The Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KANAKALA DEVI PRASANNAKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: < ... to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in pressurizing the petitioner to handover the possession of land of an extent Ac.3-69 cents in Sy.No.51-2, situated at Krishnapuram village, Atmakuru Mandal, Kurnool District to the respondents 4 to 6 and in pressurizing the petitioner to withdraw civil cases and cases pending before Revenue Authorities as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 21 and 300-A of The Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes and pass ...= None represented for the Petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that there are civil disputes between the parties with regard to the subject property and that respondent Police never insisted the petitioner to withdraw the cases pending against the unofficial respondents and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 07.01.2026 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 21407 of 2022 07.01.2026 Mjl /*