Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22397 (AP)

Korlipara Triloknadh Chowdary v. Karthikeya Mishra, IAS

CC/1718/2021 · 2026-02-04

Ninala Jayasurya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010353932021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1718 OF 2021 Between: 1. KORLIPARA TRILOKNADH CHOWDARY, S/O. RAMACHANDRA RAO, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. DENDULURU VILLAGE, DENDULURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. KARTHIKEYA MISHRA IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. K RAMESH BABU, S/O.NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. A B C V LAKSHMI, W/O. NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS MANDAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, DENDULURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. NIMMALURI NANCHARAIAH, S/O. NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS TAHSILDHAR, DENDULURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. T NIKHIL MADHU SARAN, S/O. NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, DENDULURU GRAMAPANCHAYAT, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMAKRISHNA AKURATHI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI 2. P SUBASH 3. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI The Court made the following ORDER: Heard Mr.Battula Sanjaiah Gandhi, learned counsel representing on behalf of Mr.Akurathi Rama Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner. Alleging non-implementation of the order dated 14.11.2019 passed in W.P.No.18068 of 2019, the present Contempt Case is filed. The said Writ Petition was disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent therein to consider the representation of the petitioner and to take appropriate action and communicate the same to the petitioner. Detailed counter affidavits filed on behalf of the respondents. As per the counter affidavit of the 4th respondent and an endorsement dated 17.01.2020, annexed to the said counter, the representation of the petitioner was examined and action has been initiated. Though the said counter affidavits were filed as long back as in the year 2021, no reply affidavits have been filed. In view of the above and as this Court is satisfied that the order is complied with, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs. NINALA JAYASURYA,J Date:05.02.2026 Ssv THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1718 OF 2021 Date:05.02.2026 Ssv