Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2239 (JHR)

VISHAL KUMAR KASERA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1255/2026 · 2026-03-10

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:6234 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1255 of 2026 1. Vishal Kumar Kasera, aged about 24 years S/o Jitendra Prasad Kasera R/o Ptambara Pavitram Hotel, Near Booty More, P.O.+P.S.-Sadar, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand 2. Sunny Kumar @ Sunny Kumar Prasad, aged about 25 years, S/o Umesh Prasad, R/o Phed Colony, Booty More, P.O.+P.S.-Sadar, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, APP --- 04/10.03.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody since 16.12.2025 in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 605 of 2025 (N) for the offence registered under Sections 21(a)/22/23 of the NDPS Act, pending in the court of learned Judicial Commissioner Cum Special Judge (NDPS), Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that from the two petitioners’ small quantity of brown sugar to the extent of 0.75 gm. has been recovered as per the allegation. He has also submitted that the petitioners are in custody since 16.12.2025 and charge sheet has already been submitted. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioners do not have any criminal antecedent as per the statement made in paragraph no. 16 of the bail application. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer but does not dispute so far as the recovery from each petitioner is concerned. However, he further submits that upon their confessional statements, further recovery was made from other accused persons. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that small quantity of brown sugar alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioners and that they have no criminal antecedent and charge sheet has already been submitted, the petitioners above named are directed to be enlarged on ( 2026:JHHC:6234 ) 2 bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Commissioner Cum Special Judge (NDPS), Ranchi in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 605 of 2025 (N) on the following conditions: (i) The learned court shall ensure and verify the statement with regard to criminal antecedent of the petitioners. If any criminal antecedent is found against any of the petitioners, the concerned petitioner shall not be released on bail. (ii) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioners. (iii) The other bailor should be their close relative. (iv) The petitioners will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioners. (v) The petitioners will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which they will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (vi) The petitioners shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 10.03.2026 Uploaded on: 10.03.2026 Binit/