SYED FIDDUSAR RAHMAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS
WP(C)/237/2020 · 2026-03-17
Kardak Ete
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2239 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2239 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010007412020
2026:GAU-AS:3941
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/237/2020 SYED FIDDUSAR RAHMAN S/O- KHABIRUDDIN AHMED, R/O- VILL. NO. 2 GORESWAR, P.O. NO. 2 GORESWAR, P.S. GORESWAR, DIST. BAKSA, ASSAM, PIN- 781366. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY.- 781006 2:THE ADDL. CHIEF SECY.
GOVT. OF ASSAM ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPTT. DISPUR GHY.-06.
3:THE SECY.
GOVT. OF ASSAM ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPTT. DISPUR GHY.-6.
4:THE DIRECTOR SECONDARY EDUCATION KAHILIPARA GHY.-19.
5:THE DIRECTOR ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY.-19.
Page No.# 2/3 6:THE DY. SECY.
GOVT. OF ASSAM EDUCATION DEPTT. DISPUR GHY.-06.
7:THE SECY. EDUCATION BTAD KOKRAJHAR PIN- 783370.
8:THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION BTAD KOKRAJHAR PIN- 783370.
9:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS BTAD DISTRICT BAKSA PIN- 781371.
10:THE DIST. ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER BTAD DISTRICT BAKSA PIN -781373.
11:BETNA KAURBAHA MILA HIGH SCHOOL VILLAGE- BHOGPUR P.O. BHOGPUR DIST. BAKSA B.T.A.D. ASSAM PIN- 781366 REPRESENTED BY ITS I/C HEADMASTER SRI SANJAY KALITA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R C SAIKIA, MS. N DEY,MR. M K CHOUDHURY,MS. K SAIKIA,MR S DAS,MR G BARUAH,MS N DAS Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, MR A DASGUPTA,J U AHMED,MR S R NAWAZ (R-11),MR J U AHMED (R-11),MR. U. SARMA, SC, SEC. EDU.,SC, BTC
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 18-03-2026 Heard Mr. J. B. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file afresh. Mr. P. N. Sharma, learned Standing Counsel, Elementary Education Department; Mr. U. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Secondary Education; Ms. N. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, BTC and Mr. J. U. Ahmed, learned counsel for the respondent No. 11, are present. The prayer for withdrawal is allowed. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal, with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant