Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22389 (JHR)

SHAILESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/704/2026 · 2026-07-30

Rajesh Shankar

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2026: JHHC: 22532-DB) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 704 of 2026 Shailesh Kumar, aged about 42 years, son of Sri Ramawtar Sahu, resident of Kesar Vihar, Tonko Road, Hatia, P.O. Hatia, P.S. Jagannathpur, District Ranchi ... ... ... ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Rakesh Ranjan, Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., Ranchi, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi 3. Sri Rajeev Lochan Bakshi, Secretary, Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board, Sector-IV, P.O.: Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District Ranchi 4. Sri Nitin Singh, the Officer-in-Charge, Jagannathpur Police Station, P.O & P.S. Jagannathpur, District Ranchi 5. Madan Prasad Sahu 6. Ram Ratan Sahu Opposite Party No. 5 and 6 are sons of Late Shiv Dayal Sahu and are residents of Sonar Mohalla, Upper Hatia, P.O. Hatia, P.S. Jagannathpur, District Ranchi … … ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioner: Mr A.K. Sahani, Advocate Mr Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr Vibhor Mayank, A.C to A.G --------- 02 / Dated: 30.07.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Mr Vibhor Mayank, learned A.C to A.G states that the complaint of the petitioner will be looked into by the Respondent No. 3 within four weeks from today. 3. This statement is accepted and the contempt petition is disposed of. (M. S. Sonak, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) July 30, 2026 Ranjeet/R.Kr./Cp.1