Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22386 (AP)

M/S. VIJAYA AGRO PRODCUTS (P) LTD. v. ASST. COMMR. (CT)(LTU)-II, VIJAYAWADA & 3 OTHERS

WP/13666/2010 · 2026-01-18

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010352152010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 13666/2010 Between: 1. M/S. VIJAYA AGRO PRODCUTS (P) LTD., ENIKEPADU 521 108, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, CH.D. RAVINDRANATH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. ASST COMMR CTLTUII VIJAYAWADA 3 OTHERS, VIJAYAWADA. 2. APPELLANT DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CT, VIJAYAWADA. 3. JOINT COMMISSIONER CT LEGAL, HYDERABAD. 4. SALES TAX APPEALLATE TRIBUNAL, ADDITIONAL BENCH, D.NO. 50-50-30/12(2), MEGHANA TOWERS, OPP. GURUDWARA BUS STOP, VISAKHAPATNAM 530013 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction one in the nature of writ of mandamus setting aside the appeal rejection order passed by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, in A.R.No.314 of 2006, dated 16.12.2008, for the assessment year 2003-04 (CST), consequent on the payment of 25% of the disputed tax amounting to Rs.15,46,402/- paid by the petitioner on 03.06.2010 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 17223 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant stay of all further proceedings arising in pursuance of the appeal rejection order passed by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, in A.R.No.314 of 2006, dated 16.12.2008, for the assessment year 2003-04 (CST) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX 3 The Court made the following order: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Raghunandan Rao) The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 19.01.2026 KA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 13666/2010 Date: 19.01.2026 KA 5