Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22379 (AP)

Ande Sriramamurthy v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/23801/2020 · 2026-01-19

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010355502020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23801/2020 Between: 1.ANDE SRIRAMAMURTHY, FATHER NAME LATE POTARAJU AGE 52 R/O DOOR NO.2-130, WARD, AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 2.CHALAPALLI BANGARU RAJU, FATHER NAME LATE HANUMANTHA RAO AGE 70 R/O CHALLAPALLI, KRISHNA DT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DT. 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHALLAPALLI PS, CHALLAPALLI, KRISHNA DT. 4.SMT K SWARNA MARY, TAHSILDAR CHALLAPALLI, KRISHNA DT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.V S R ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME (AP) 2 2.GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri Karthik, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V.S.R.Anjaneyalu, learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the cause of action in the Writ Petition does not survive. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 20.01.2026 VTS