Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22375 (KAR)

SMT SUMALAKSHMI v. SRI R A MAHESH

RFA/1737/2012 · 2026-06-17

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29693 RFA No. 1737 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1737 OF 2012 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUMALAKSHMI, W/O. V.BALAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, NO.1237, 9TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, SBM COLONY, SRINIVASANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 050. 2. SRI. V.BALAKRISHNA, S/O. LATE VENKATESHALU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, NO.1237, 9TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, SBM COLONY, SRINIVASANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 050. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K.RAGHAVENDRA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: SRI. R.A.MAHESH, S/O. R.S.ANJANEYA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, NO.816/E, 16TH CROSS, 7TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 082. …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29693 RFA No. 1737 of 2012 THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. The appeal was listed on 22.04.2026. On that day also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants and the matter was ordered to be listed today i.e., 17.06.2026. As already mentioned above, when he matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. It appears the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 79