APHC010355402018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 16423/2018 Between: 1. THAMMIREDDY CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY, S/O T.RADHAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, RIO MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUEDEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. SUB COLLECTOR, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. TAHSILDAR, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus a. declaring the inaction of the respondent no.3 in sending report to the respondent no.2 in pursuance to the communication of the respondent no.2 vide Roc 64/4460/2016 dt.04.11.2016 as arbitrary and illegal and violative of the rights guaranteed to the petitioner under articles 14, 21 and 300 A of the constitution of India and b. direct the respondent no.3 to furnish report to the respondent no.2 in compliance of the communication of 2 JS, J W.P.No.16423/2018 the respondent no.2 vide Roc B4/4460/2016 dt.04.11.2016 and c. direct the respondent no.2 to dispose of the appeal dt.25.10.2016 preferred by the petitioner by considering the report from the respondent no.3 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.3 to comply with the communication of the respondent no.2 vide Roc B4/4460/2016 dt.04.11.2016 and send report to the respondent no.2 and direct the respondent no.2 to pass appropriate orders on the appeal dt.25.10.2016 preferred by the petitioner by considering the report of the respondent no.3 pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P S RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 JS, J W.P.No.16423/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 29.01.2026 rsd 4 JS, J W.P.No.16423/2018 19 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 16423/2018 Date: 29.01.2026 rsd