2026:JHHC:22741 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5745 of 2026 Mustakim Ahmed @ Mustakim Ahmad, Son of Late Md. Hanif … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratik Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Advocate --- 03/29th July 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 62/2026 for the offence registered under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of BNS and Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) & 84(C) of IT Act, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar. 2. The counter-affidavit filed during the court proceedings is taken on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 30.04.2026 and charge-sheet has already been submitted. One mobile phone and one SIM Card are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. However, neither any criminal link has been found nor any victim has been identified in connection with the mobile phone and SIM card allegedly recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The learned counsel has referred to paragraph 14 of the bail application and submitted that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent of 2019, in which he has been acquitted. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute. 2026:JHHC:22741 2 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the charge-sheet has already been submitted and that neither any criminal link has been found nor any victim has been identified, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum- Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 62/2026, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 29.07.2026 Uploaded On: 31.07.2026 Mukul/-