- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29174 WP No. 21277 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 21277 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. K M MANJUNATH S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT KYALASANAHALLI VILLAGE JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT - 560105 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MALLAIAH M R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE - 560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT BANGALORE - 560009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE SOUTH BANGALORE SUB DIVISION Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29174 WP No. 21277 of 2024 BANGALORE - 560009. 4. THE TAHASHILDAR ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL – 562106. 5. SRI L MUNIRAJAPPA S/O LATE LINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 6. SRI NAGESH S/O LATE DYAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 7. SMT. BHAGYAMMA W/O NAGESH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 8. SRI K N SRIRAMA S/O NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 9. SRI K N ASHOKA S/O NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT KYALASANAHALLI VILLAGE JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 560105. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA., AGA FOR R1 TO R4 SRI. C.SHANKAR REDDY., ADVOCATE FOR R5 SRI. S.VISWESWARAIAH., ADVOCATE FOR R6 & R7 R8 & R9 SERVED & UNREPRESENTED) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29174 WP No. 21277 of 2024 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 14/06/2024 MADE IN R. P. NO. 167/2021 BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT AT ANN-A AND DIRECT THE THAHASHILDAR TO GENERATE THE KHATA RTC AND ECS IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER AS PER THE EARLIER IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE SOUTH AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard Sri Mallaish.M.R, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt.B.P.Radha, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 - State; Sri C.Shankar Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.5 and Sri S.Visweswaraiah, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.6 & 7. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29174 WP No. 21277 of 2024 2. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 14.06.2024 (Annexure-A) passed by the respondent No.2 - the Deputy Commissioner. 3. The petitioner is claiming right over the property in terms of the registered sale deed made during 1935, which is produced at Annexure-B, however, the perusal of the record would indicate that land in question is Inam land and it was re-granted in favour of one Dodda Dyavanna on 27.06.1966. 4. In that view of the matter, I do not find any merit in this writ petition, as the respondent No.2, after considering the material on record has rightly passed the impugned order. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE KLY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 62