SHARANABASWANNA MANGALORE v. M/S PINEHILL PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED
AP.IM/3/2025 · 2026-06-18
M G S Kamal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22363 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22363 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30121 AP.IM No. 3 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ARBITRATION PETITION-INTERIM MEASURE NO. 3 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
SHARANABASWANNA MANGALORE AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS RESIDING AT : BLOCK 171 B, #16-450, EDGEDALE, PLAINS, PUNGGOL, EDGEDALE PLAINS, 822171, PUNGGOL, SINGAPORE
THROUGH ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR. PRANAV DADHICH S/O VIJENDER DADHICH, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O 6162, ATS ONE HAMLET, CNG PUMP, SECTOR 104, NOIDA, GAUTAM BUDDHA NAGAR, UTTAR PRADESH- 201 304. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MOHAMMED SHAKEEB M. MULLA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
M/S PINEHILL PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 500, EMBASSY CROWN, 24, AGA ABBAS ALI ROAD,
BANGALORE – 560 042.
2.
M/S SMART OWNERS SERVICES
INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
THROUGH ITS
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 8TH FLOOR, DELTA BLOCK,
Digitally signed by VANDANA S Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30121 AP.IM No. 3 of 2025
SIGMA TECH PARK, WHITEFIELD,
BANGALORE -560 066. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. LAKSHMI MENON, ADVOCATE FOR R-1;
SRI. VISHWAJITH MALAVIKA PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
THIS ARBITRATION PETITION-INTERIM MEASURE FILED UNDER SECTION 9 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 AND AMENDED ACT 2015 PRAYING TO PASS AN EX- PARTE AD-INTERIM AND/OR AD-INTERIM ORDER DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO SECURE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF ARBITRATION AND TO DEPOSIT AN AMOUNT OF INR 44,98,200/- (INDIAN RUPEE FORTY-FOUR LAKHS NINETY EIGHT THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED ONLY) BEFORE THIS HON’BLE COURT VIDE ANNEXURE - F DATED 23.02.2017.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cost imposed has already been paid. Learned counsel files a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. The aforesaid memo reads as under:
“Memo for Withdrawal The petitioner most respectfully submits before this Hon’ble Court that the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30121 AP.IM No. 3 of 2025
petition on the ground that the same is not maintainable for want of jurisdiction. It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit withdrawal of the instant petition, with liberty to the petitioner to institute appropriate proceedings before the competent forum, in accordance with law, in the interest of justice and equity.”
2. The aforesaid memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought for subject to all just exceptions.
Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE
SV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23