1 / 3 2026:CGHC:24650 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4560 of 2026 Smt. Pakli Bai Muriya W/o Nammuram Aged About 69 Years R/o Vill- Thotapara Takraguda I T I Bastar Post, Tah, And Distt- Bastar C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of CG, Through The Secretary P.W.D. Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya New Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Engineer In Chief Public Works Department District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Chief Engineer (Administration) Public Works Department District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Chief Engineer Public Works Department (Bh/ Sa) North Bastar Division No.02 Jagdalpur Distt- Bastar (C.G.) 5 - The Superintendent Engineer P W D (Bh/sa) North Bastar Division No.2 Jagdalpur Distt- Bastar C.G. 6 - The Executive Engineer P W (Bh/sa) North Bastar Division No.2 Jagdalpur Distt- Bastar C.G. 7 - Divisional Joint Director Treasury Account And Pension Bastar Division Jagdalpur Distt- Bastar C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Vikash A. Shrivastava, Advocate For State /Respondents : Ms. Poorva Tiwari, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru) Order on Board 18/06/2026 ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2026.06.19 17:51:46 +0530 2 / 3 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who stood retired as Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employee, is entitled for leave encashment but till date respondents have not extended the benefit of leave encashment to petitioner. Identical issue came up for hearing before this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & Ors. Vs. State of C.G., in W.P.(S) No. 3870 of 2021 decided on 30.09.2022, wherein petitioners have raised identical issue which was allowed in their favour. He submits that at this stage, petitioner may be permitted to submit representation in light of Faguvaram Patel (supra) and respondents be directed to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner expeditiously within specified time. 2. Learned State counsel submits that as the petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to decide the representations to be submitted by petitioner, at this stage, he is having no objection. 3. I have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the documents available in record. 4. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, this petition is disposed of in light of Faguvaram Patel (Supra) and the petitioner is at liberty to make representation within a period fo 15 days from receipt of copy of this order. In the event, the petitioner is found to be similarly situated persons, her claim shall be decided by the respondents in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of 3 / 3 representation. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. 6. C.C. as per rules. SD/- SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE ashu