Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2236 (CAL)

ABHIK DEY @ RAJA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1875/2025 · 2026-02-02

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

02.02.2026 Court No.35. M/L. 91. Kausik CRM (M) 1875 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. And In the matter of : Abhik Dey @ Raja ……Petitioner. Mr. Jagannath Ganguly ……for the Petitioner. Ms. Tannistha Bandyopadhyay …..for the Victim. Mr. Prasun Kumar Dutta, Ld. APP Mr. Dipankar Paramanick ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to proceed with the bail application. Learned advocate for the Victim as well as the State is present. Report submitted by the State be kept with the record. Having regard to the statements made by Mr. Ganguly, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner, CRM (M) 1875 of 2025 is dismissed as not pressed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. 2 Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)