MANJIT RAI SAINI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/16973/2026 · 2026-05-29
Mandeep Pannu
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22358 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22358 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
256
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.16973 of 2026
Date of decision: 29.05.2026
Manjit Rai Saini and another
…Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
…Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU
Present :- Mr. Salil Dev Singh Bali, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Sandeep Dhanda, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Ritu Raj Singh, DAG, Punjab.
***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral)
1.
The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (now Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) seeking extension of the period granted by the learned Trial Court vide
order dated 07.02.2026, whereby the petitioners were permitted to travel abroad from 10.02.2026 till 15.04.2026 in FIR No.34 dated 26.02.2020, registered under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC (Section 120- B IPC having subsequently been deleted and Section 467 IPC having been added vide order dated 03.07.2024), at Police Station Bhogpur, District Jalandhar Rural.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners seek extension of the aforesaid period of travel abroad for a further period beyond 15.04.2026 on the grounds stated in the petition.
NEETU RANI 2026.05.29 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD
CRM-M No.16973 of 2026
-2-
3.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and have gone through the record.
4.
At the outset, this Court is of the view that the prayer for extension of the period initially granted by the learned Trial Court ought to have been raised before the said Court in the first instance. Be that as it may, it is not disputed that the present petition was filed on 19.02.2026. However, during the pendency of the present petition, the period of permission granted by the learned Trial Court has already expired on
15.04.2026.
5.
In view of the above, no effective relief survives for adjudication in the present petition and the same has, thus, been rendered infructuous.
6.
Consequently, the present petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. However, in the interest of justice, the petitioners are
directed to appear before the concerned Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate on or before 15.06.2026. It shall be open to the petitioners to move an appropriate application before the competent Court seeking any further relief, which shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.
7.
All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(MANDEEP PANNU) 29.05.2026
JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No
NEETU RANI 2026.05.29 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD