Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22358 (AP)

Pampana Vijaya Kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh.

WP/21369/2021 · 2026-03-02

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010353192021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 21369/2021 Between: 1. PAMPANA VIJAYA KUMAR, , S/O. RAMAKRISHNA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, SENIOR ASST. (UNDER SUSPENSION) IN SRI M.S.N. CHARITIES, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS) DEPT., SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. M S N CHARITIES, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS ASST. COMMISSIONER CUM EXECUTIVE OFFICER ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ order or direction more particularly writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in continuing the petitioner under suspension as per charge memo in Rc. No.A2/167/2021 dated 18-3-2021 as bad, illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14, 16, 21, 25 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the suspension orders of the 2nd respondent vide charge memo in Rc. No.A2/167/2021 dated 18-3-2021 IA NO: 1 OF 2021 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of impugned charge memo dated 18-3-2021' only in regard to the suspension of the petitioner Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T BALAJI 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 21369/2021 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo, wherein it is stated that the petitioner was reinstated in the service. Thereafter, the suspension period was also treated as leave period vide proceedings dated 30.06.2024, as such no further orders are required to be passed in this Writ Petition and requested to close the Writ Petition. 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 03.03.2026 TPS 4 102 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO:21369/2021 03.03.2026 TPS