Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22357 (PNJ)

RAJINDER KUMAR @ LAL CHAND v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CRM-M/31792/2026 · 2026-05-29

Aman Chaudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 157 CRM-M-31792-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.05.2026 RAJINDER KUMAR @ LAL CHAND ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. RS Dhillon, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that the matter has already been enquired into by the Superintendent of Police, concerned who has concluded that it is a case of civil dispute and both the parties may avail of the remedy, in accordance with law, in view of which, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition, any further. 2. Ordered accordingly. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 29.05.2026 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.05.29 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document