IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 15568/2026 Decided on: 09.09.2026 Subhdra Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar Dogra, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J The petitioner is aggrieved by the non-consideration of her representation dated 19.07.2026 (Annexure P-4), seeking counting of the contractual services rendered by her for the purpose of pensionary benefits, seniority and annual increments under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972. Petitioner's grievance is that the aforesaid representation has still not been considered and decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content, in case, the said respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Deputy Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 9th September, 2026 (Rohit)