Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2235 (MAD)

Dhinesh v. The Sub-Divisional Executive Magistrate-cum-Revenue Divisional Officer,

CRL OP/9486/2026 · 2026-04-16

M Nirmal Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 9486 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP No. 9486 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.6722 of 2026 Dhinesh S/o. Velusami, Kalani Street, Vankudi Village, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur - 612 903. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Sub-Divisional Executive Magistrate-cum- Revenue Divisional Officer, Udarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Meenasurutty Police Station, Ariyalur District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, praying to call for the records and quash the impugned unnumbered summon dated 20.02.2026 issued by the 1st respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.U.Pressanna For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Vinothraja, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9486 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The petitioner, challenging the impugned summon dated 20.02.2026 had filed this quash petition. 2.The contention of the learned counsel for petitioner is that the summon dated 20.02.2026 served to the petitioner without any basis. The petitioner is a mason doing construction work at Ariyalur District and his entire family livelihood is based on the income earned by the petitioner. If the petitioner is forced to appear before the respondents, he will be losing his daily income and his family would be denied of his income. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioner is a History Sheeter with H.S.No.114 of 2008. There are two cases against the petitioner, one case is pending for offence under Section 302 of I.P.C. Due to the impending general election, the petitioner was served with summons to execute a bond. 4.The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner will appear before the first respondent on 20.04.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9486 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5.It is seen that the impugned summons issued directing the petitioner to appear on 27.02.2026. The day has passed by. Hence, the petitioner is directed to appear before the first respondent on 20.04.2026 and execute the bond. 6.With the above directions, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 16-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RSI To 1. The Sub-Divisional Executive Magistrate-cum- Revenue Divisional Officer, Udyarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Meensurutty Police Station, Ariyalur District. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9486 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 RSI CRL OP No. 9486 of 2026 16-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis