APHC010349932018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX [3459] PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.16247 OF 2018 Between: Vajrapu Shankar Rao. --- Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department (Registration-II), Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District and 4 others. --- Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri V.Y. Prabhuvu Counsel for the respondents : G.P. for Revenue, G.P. for Registration & Stamps The Court made the following 2 ORDER: The instant Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner, seeking the following relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents 3 & 4 refusing to entertain the sale transactions of the landed property admeasuring an extent of Ac.4.00 cents in Sy.No.350/2 issued vide Patta Rc.No..267/79, dated: 09.08.1979 by 5th respondent to father of petitioner’s vendor situated at Madhurawada Village, Chinnagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam District as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the relevant provisions of the Registration & Stamps Act and consequently direct the Respondents 3 & 4 to entertain sale transactions and to give effect registration over the above mentioned landed property and release the documents and pass such other ............................” 2. When the matter was listed on 23.01.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on that day. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today. Even today, there is no representation on his behalf. 3. However, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing on behalf of the respondents, fairly submits that since the petitioner has not filed any sale agreement before the 4th respondent, for registration, and therefore the registration of the aforesaid document does not arise and if the relevant original sale 3 agreement is filed before the 4th respondent, they will follow the due process of law. 4. Recording the aforesaid submission of learned Assistant Government Pleader, and without going into merits of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed by directing the petitioner to file appropriate sale agreement before the respondent authorities for registration. If the required sale agreement is filed before the respondent authorities, for registration, needless to specify, the respondent authorities shall register the document, by following due process of law. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:30.01.2026 DSH