APHC010349092024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3589/2024 Between: 1. MANNEMALA DEVA DHEERAJ REDDY, S/O. MANNEMALA SUKUMAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. FLAT NO.504, MARUTHI GRAND APARTMENT, TEACHERS COLONY, MUSUNURU RURAL, MUSUNURU SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MR G SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. MR PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. MR O ANAND IAS, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. MR P KRISHNAMOHAN, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. MR NAGARAJU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, NELLORE CENTRAL DIVISION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents herein under the provisions of Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, for willful and deliberate violation of the orders of this Honble Court dated-24.06.2024 passed in W.P.No.9808 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T VENU GOPAL Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU 2. K M KRISHNA REDDY 3. SUSHMA YAGANTI The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3589/2024 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 24.06.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.9808 of 2024. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner herein was furnished with instructions dated 23.02.2026 stating that the orders of this Court are complied with. Hence, he requested to close the contempt case granting liberty. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents also furnished written instructions dated 23.02.2026 issued by respondent No.5, wherein it is stated that the orders of this Court are complied with by paying the amount claimed by the petitioner on 23.02.2026. Hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. 5. Recording the said submissions, the Contempt Case is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to initiate separate proceedings for further claim if any. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 23.02.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP 4 39 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3589/2024 23.02.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP