APHC010343282013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 34918 OF 2013 Between: 1. MANTHENA VENKATA RAMA KRISHNAM RAJU,, S/O VENKATA RAJU, AGED 78 YEARS, LANDLORD, R/O D.NO.1-86-5, MIG 162/4,OCC. NOT KNOWN, SECTOR IV, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. SMT MANTHENA ANNAPURNAYYA,, W/O MANTHENA VENKATA RAJU, AGED 68 YEARS, LANDLADY, OW. NOT KNOWN, R/O D.NO.1-86-5, MIG 162/4, SECTOR IV, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. MANTHENA VENKATA SATYA SURYANARAYANA RAJU,, S/O SRI M.VENKATA RAMA KRISHNAM RAJU, AGED 49 YEARS, LANDLORD. R/O D.NO. 1-86-5, MIG 162/4, SECTOR IV, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. GOVT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS SECRETARY MUNICIPAL, ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY ITS VICE-CHAIRMAN. 2 4. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATAM. 5. TAHSILDHAR, VISAKHAPATNAM (RURAL) CHINAGADILI, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. M/S LORVEN BUILDERS VRIDHI CHAMBERS, 4TH FLOOR, ROCK DALE LAYOUT, 7 HILLS ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY SRI SRINIVASAMURTHY. 7. SMT DANDU MADHAVI, W/O SRI D.RAVIKUMAR RAJU, AGED MAJOR, R/O H.NO.MIG-5, NE LAYOUT, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 013. 8. SMT PENUMATASA SHARMILA, W/O. SRI P.MURALI MAHESHWARA RAJU, AGED MAJOR, R/O 50-26-9, TPT COLONY, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM 530 013. 9. SRI INDUKURI SATYANARAYA RAJU, S/O. LATE SRI BANGARU RAJU AGED MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOW, R/O H.NO.MIG 5, NE LAY OUT, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction preferably a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the Official Respondents 2 and 3 in acting upon the representation of the petitioners dated 18.11.2013, which has been acknowledged by them, as being illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to forthwith take appropriate action on the said representation and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M KARUNA SAGAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K S MURTHY 2. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY(SC FOR GVMC) 3. GP FOR REVENUE 4. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU SC For VUDA and MUDA 5. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV 3 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: This Writ Petition is of the year 2013. When this matter was listed on 03.03.2026, none appeared for the Writ Petitioner. Therefore, this Court had directed the Registry to list this matter under the caption 8for Dismissal9. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 11.03.2026 Mnr 4 96 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 34918 OF 2013 Dt: 11.03.2026 Mnr