Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22340 (KAR)

SMT. USHA GANGADHAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/22799/2022 · 2026-06-18

M G S Kamal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30119 WP No. 22799 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 22799 OF 2022 (GM-KSR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. USHA GANGADHAR AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 2. SMT. POORNIMA CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 3. SMT. VASANTHA SHANKAR AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 4. SMT. USHA B C AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 5. SMT. NAGALAMBIKA PARAMESH AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS 6. SMT. SMITHA ARUN PRASAD AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 7. SMT. KAVITHA K AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 8. SMT. PADMA KAMATH K N AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 9. SMT. R. VIJAYALAKSHMI BHANUPRAKASH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 10. SMT. T.S. SHARADHA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS Digitally signed by VANDANA S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30119 WP No. 22799 of 2022 11. SMT TARA RAVISHANKAR AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 12. SMT. PADVAMATHI .N AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 13. SMT. A KAVITHA MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 14. SMT. K PUSHPALATHA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 15. SMT. S. ROOPASHREE AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS ALL ARE MEMBERS OF MAHILA SAMAJA NEW EXTENSION KOLAR - 563 101 REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT 1960. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI.M.B.CHANDRA CHOODA, ADVOCATE FOR P-5, P-6, P-8 & P-13 SRI. SRINANDAN KARTHIKEYAN, ADVOCATE FOR P-1 TO P4, P7, P9, P10, P11, P12, P14 & P15) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO OPERATION REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES DISTRICT CO OPERATIVE UNION BUILDING KOLAR DISTRICT – 563 101. 3. MAHILA SAMAJA NEW ECTENTION KOLAR 563101 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30119 WP No. 22799 of 2022 BY ITS SECRETARY REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT 1960. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS KUMAR, AGA FOR R-1 & R-2; SRI. RAGHAVENDRA.K, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUITON OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE RESOLUTION DTD 04.05.2022 AT SERIAL NO.4 PASSED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANNX-E AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petition may be dismissed as withdrawn and liberty may be reserved in favour of the petitioners to seek appropriate reliefs before the competent Court of civil jurisdiction. He further submits that the time consumed in prosecuting this petition be directed to be considered for the purpose of limitation. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30119 WP No. 22799 of 2022 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that he has no objection for the same. 3. The aforesaid submission is placed on record. 4. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought for. The time consumed in prosecuting the same shall be considered for the purpose of condoning delay, subject to all just exceptions. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE SV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16