Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22335 (KAR)

SRI BASAVARAJ P v. ASST. GENERAL MANAGER

WP/22737/2022 · 2026-06-12

M G S Kamal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28512 WP No. 22737 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 22737 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. BASAVARAJ P. S/O. LATE G. SANNA VEERANNA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.599/1A, 1ST FLOOR, RAJATADHRI APARTMENTS, 4TH MAIN, 2ND PHASE, NAGARABHAVI 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 072 2. SMT SATYAPREMA P. W/O LATE G SANNA VEERANNA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/AT NO.599/1A, 1ST FLOOR, RAJATADHRI APARTMENTS, 4TH MAIN, 2ND PHASE, NAGARABHAVI 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 072 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAMA BHAT K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ASST. GENERAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA, RACPC, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU - 560 040 Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28512 WP No. 22737 of 2022 2. THE CHIEF MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA, CHANDRA LAYOUT BRANCH, J.J. TOWERS, BEHIND CHANDRA LAYOUT BUS DEPOT, BENGALURU - 560 040 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGEESHA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 VIDE ORDER DATED 04.06.2026, NOTICE TO R2 IS D/W) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO RETURN THE DOCUMENTS TO THE PETITIONERS AS LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE HEREIN. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioner is seeking return of the original document, which he purported to have submitted to the respondents- Bank. 2. Perusal of the record indicates that there were certain pending civil suits and writ petitions. By a communication at Annexure-'H', the respondents-Bank has called upon the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28512 WP No. 22737 of 2022 petitioner to furnish the details with regard to the status of the suit and the writ petition. Though a response dated 05.04.2022 at Annexure-'J' to the same has been issued by the petitioner, the same do not reflect the status having been furnished. No such status is furnished before this Court either. 3. Accordingly, petition is disposed of, permitting the petitioner to approach the respondents-bank by furnishing the details as sought for. On petitioner furnishing the requisite details, the respondents-Bank shall return the documents expeditiously. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE PSJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20