Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22332 (JHR)

AMIT KUMAR JHA @ AMIT KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7081/2026 · 2026-07-29

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:22495] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7081 of 2026 ------ Amit Kumar Jha @ Amit Kumar, aged about 31 years, S/o Subh Kant Jha, R/o Janta Market, Chhota Govindpur, P.O. & P.S. Govindpur, Town-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum. .... .... …. Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party. ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. B.N. Ojha, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 29-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Burmamines P.S. Case No. 26 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under sections 111(2)(b) of the B.N.S., 2023 along with Sections 17(a), 21(a), 22(a), 27(a) and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with co-accused persons, were in illegal possession of altogether 26.57 gm of brown sugar which is also known as heroine and which comes under intermediate quantity; out of which 3.01 gm. of brown sugar was recovered from the house of the petitioner, which comes under the small quantity. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has been in custody since 10.05.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 12 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act) at Jamshedpur, in connection with Burmamines P.S. Case No. 26 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 29/07/2026 Amar/