Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2233 (AP)

KOORAPARTHI YERRAMA REDDY v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/14626/2026 · 2026-05-20

Balaji Medamalli

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010281992026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 14626/2026 Between: 1. KOORAPARTHI YERRAMA REDDY, KOORAPARTHI YERRAMA REDDY S/O LATE VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. MEKALAVARIPALLI, H/O BODIREDDYGARIPALLI, PULICHERLA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 517113. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P.SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT - 517501. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ROMPICHERLA POLICE STATION, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT -517192. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KALLUR POLICE STATION, PULICHERLA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT - 517113. 5. SMT P KAVITHA, W/O LATE P SURENDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O BANDAMEDAPALII, H/O PEDDAMALLELA, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT -517192. 6. P VINOTHANA, , D/O LATE P SURENDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, R/O BANDAMEDAPALII, H/O PEDDAMALLELA, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT -517192. 7. SURESH KUMAR REDDY, S/O VENKATA RAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O SV NAGAR, TIRUPATHI WEST, TIRUPATHI DIVISION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT -517501. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Official respondents 2 to 4 in not taking action against the 5th to respondents in spite of complaint dated 10.05.2026 and 14.05.2026 to the 2nd and 3rd respondents as per the provision of chapter VIII of BNS, 2023 is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 350 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents 2 to 4 to register the crime against the respondents 5th to 7th on the compliant dated 10.05.2026 and 14.05.2026 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to take appropriate action against the respondents 5 to 7 as per provision of chapter VIII of BNS, 2023. on the compliant 14.05.2026, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. J M NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 14626/2026 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Official respondents 2 to 4 in not taking action against the 5th to 7th respondents in spite of complaint dated 10.05.2026 and 14.05.2026 to the 2nd and 3rd respondents as per the provision of chapter VIII of BNS, 2023 is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 350 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents 2 to 4 to register the crime against the respondents 5th to 7th on the compliant dated 10.05.2026 and 14.05.2026 and pass such other order or orders...’’ 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home furnished written instructions dated 21.05.2026 of the 3rd respondent, wherein it is stated that, based on the complaint dated 10.05.2026, a preliminary enquiry was conducted and it was found that the contents of the complaint relates to family transactions and are predominantly civil in nature. It is further stated that the 5th respondent had also filed a complaint containing similar allegations, and that a preliminary enquiry was conducted with reference to both complaints. 4. In view of the said instructions, since the Police have opined that the contents of the complaint do not disclose any cognizable offence and are civil nature, no action has been taken thereon. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the same, he has an alternative remedy of approaching the concerned learned jurisdictional Magistrate by filing an appropriate criminal petition. 5. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Dt.21.05.2026 JLV 21 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 14626/2026 Dt.21.05.2026 JLV