Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22329 (HP)

RAVI SINGH v. COLLECTOR LAND ACQUITITION AND ANR

CMP/23085/2026 · 2026-09-09

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ravi Singh (deceased) through LRs. vs. Collector Land Acquisition & Ors. CMP No.23085 of 2026 in RFA No.623 of 2011 09.09.2026 Present: Mr. Lokesh Thakur, Advocate vice Mr.G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the non-applicants/appellants. Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for non-applicant/respondent No.1. Mr. Harshit Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the applicant/respondent No.2. CMP No.23086 of 2026 The present application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC has been filed by the legal representatives of deceased applicant/appellant, Ravi Singh, who has expired on 27.07.2026, for their impleadment in his place. The application is duly supported with the affidavit of legal representative,Kamal Singh. Learned Deputy Advocate General as well as learned vice counsel for respondent No.2, stated that they don't intend to file any reply to the application and have no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed. Heard. Since appellant, Ravi Singh, has expired on 27.07.2026, as is evident from his death certificate, annexed with the application as Annexure A-2, the present application is allowed and applicants as mentioned in legal heirs certificate, annexed with the application as Annexure A-1, are ordered to be substituted in place of appellant Ravi Singh, whose name is otherwise ordered to be deleted from the array of the parties. Application stands disposed of. CMP No.23085 of 2026 The instant application under Section 151 of CPC, has been filed by the applicants/appellants No.1(a) to 1(c), namely Kamal Singh, Bhim Singh and Sarojani, for release of enhanced compensation amount alongwith up- to-date interest, in their favour, as per their equal shares. Learned Deputy Advocate General as well as learned vice counsel for respondent No.2, stated that they don't intend to file any reply to the application and have no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed. Heard. In view of the averments made in the application, which are duly supported with the affidavits of the applicants as well as taking into consideration the no objection of learned counsel for the parties, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release the compensation amount alongwith up-to-date interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of the applicants/appellants No.1(a) to 1(c), namely Kamal Singh, Bhim Singh and Sarojani, as per their equal shares, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to their saving bank accounts, details whereof have been mentioned in Para-3 of the application. Application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge September 09, 2026 (reena)