OIC Ltd. Vs. Amri Devi & Ors. CMP No. 21296 & 21297/2026 in FAO No. 402/2010 09.09.2026 Present: Ms. Mamta, Advocate, vice Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the non- applicant/appellant. Mr. Suneet Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Varun Rana, Advocate, for applicants/proposed respondents No. 2(a) to 2(d). CMP No. 21296/2026 The present application under Order 1, Rule 10 CPC has been filed by the applicants for their impleadment as respondents, being legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 2, Sher Singh. As per the applicants, respondent No. 2, has expired on 19.05.2014, however, his share is still lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, which is required to be released in favour of the present applicants. The application is duly supported by an affidavit of one of the applicants, death certificate of the deceased as well as legal heirs certificate. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned vice counsel for the non- applicant/appellant, under instructions received from the original counsel, has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of one of the applicants, the same is allowed and the applicants, being legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 2, are ordered to be impleaded as party in the present appeal and shall figure as respondent No. 2(a) to 2(d) in the array of respondents. The application stands disposed of. CMP No. 21297/2026 The present application, under Section 151 CPC, has been filed by applicants/respondents No. 2(a) to 2(d), for release of the award amount falling in the share of respondent No. 2, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported by the affidavits of all the applicants. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned vice counsel for the non- applicant/appellant, under instructions received from the original counsel, has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavits of all the applicants, coupled with the fact that till date, no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality, the same is allowed and the amount falling in the share of deceased respondent No. 2, Sher Singh, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of applicants/respondents No. 2(a) to 2(d), as per their respective shares, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to their bank accounts, details whereof have been mentioned vide copy of passbooks, appended with the application. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 9th September, 2026 (raman)