Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22319 (AP)

METTA CHINNAMMA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/17807/2025 · 2026-03-16

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010350802025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 17807/2025 Between: 1. METTA CHINNAMMA, W/O M.KRISHNAMURTHY LATE AGED 67 YEARS,OCCIHOUSEWIFE TAMALAPURAM VILLAGE NANDIGAM MANDALAM SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT,VELAGAPUDI.AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TEKKALI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHASILDHAR, TEKKALI MANDALAM , SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. EXECUTIVE OFFICER, GRAMA PANCHAYAT TEKKALI, 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TEKKALI URBAN POLICE STATION 7. SAMPATIRAO SURYARAJU, S/O S.KRISHNARAO,AGED 56 YEARS TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDALAM SRIKAKULAM DIXTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 BKM,J W.P.No.17807 of 2025 pleased topleased Mssue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofMandamus to declare the inaction'of the Respondents No.3 to 5 are hot considering the representation made by the petitioner dated 18.11.2024 and to stop theJIlegal constructions made by the 7 th respondent is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art. 14, 21 and 300 (A) of Constitution of India and also violation of the Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondents to stop the illegal constructions made by the 7 th respondent in the petitioners schedule land in Sy.No 509/2H for extent of Ac 0.14 cents at Rotary nagar .Tekkali Village and mandalam without following due process of Law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 18.11.2024 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M. SAPTHAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. MOHAMMAD NAYAB RASOOL 3 BKM,J W.P.No.17807 of 2025 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition, for which he has taken a Court slip dated 16.03.2026. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 17.03.2026 PGT