Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22317 (KAR)

M/S. NHS INDUSTRIES v. THE CHIEF MANAGER

WP/9708/2026 · 2026-06-16

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29499 WP No. 9708 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 9708 OF 2026 (GM-KIADB) BETWEEN: M/S. NHS INDUSTRIES PLOT NO.IP(A) P-2, PHASE-1, GOURIBIDNUR INDUSTRIAL AREA, KUDUMALAKUNTE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, GOURIBIDNUR TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 561 208 REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI. BHARGAV REDDY. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASHEKAR K.H, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHIEF MANAGER CANARA BANK, HSR LAYOUT BRANCH, NO.-L 1135, GROUND FLOOR, AVANI ARCADE, 17TH CROSS, 7TH SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 102. 2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, M.S.BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIGNESH S. SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. K.B. MONESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29499 WP No. 9708 of 2026 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS. DIRECTING THE R1 BANK TO RELEASE THE SCHEDULE A PROPERTY WHICH HAS BEEN MORTGAGED IN FAVOUR OF THE R1 BANK BY THE PETITIONER INDUSTRY AS AGREED BY THE R1 BANK. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: (a) Call for records. (b) Issue an order, direction or writ in the nature of writ of mandamus, directing the 1st respondent bank to release the Schedule A property which has been mortgaged in favour of the 1 respondent bank by the petitioner Industry as agreed by the 1st respondent bank. (c) Pass such other relief as deems fit by this Hon'ble court in the and circumstances of the case. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the above petition has been rendered infructuous and a memo to that effect has been filed, which reads as under: "The above writ petition become infructuous, since the I respondent have already - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29499 WP No. 9708 of 2026 released the mortgage documents to the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous in the interest of justice." 3. Accepting the submission of the counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE GJM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39