IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 15424/2026 Decided on: 09.09.2026 Raj Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Mr. Rahul Singh and Ms. Oshin Anand Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents1 & 2. Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, learned counsel, accept notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. Petitioner’’ grievance is that his representation dated 08.10.2026 (Annexure P-4 colly) seeking applicability Anil Kumar Kohli Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2CWPOA No. 83/2020, decided on 28.03.2024 2 submitted that the petitioner would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to this prayer. Without adverting to the merits of the matter and without examining the issue of delay, laches & acquiescence, if any, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 9th September, 2026(rohit)