S. JAYALAKSHMI v. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
MACMA/1106/2019 · 2026-01-21
T C D Sekhar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22316 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22316 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010353682019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1106/2019 Between:
1. S. JAYALAKSHMI, W/O LATE S. DURGA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 15-23A, RAMAIHA NAIDU COLONY, PAKALA TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DIST.
...APPELLANT AND
1. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGER, K.G.F. DEPOT, KOLAR, KARNATAKA STATE.
2. S JANAKI DURGA RAO, S/O DURGA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 15-24, RAMAIAH NAIDU COLONY, PAKALA TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DIST.
3. M/S NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, REP.
BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, HAVING OFFICE AT G.N.
MADA STREET, TIRUPATHI.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. SIVA PRASAD YADAVALLI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SREEMANNARAYANA VATTIKUTI
2. RAMA MOHAN RAO KOTHA The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:-
1. The matter was listed on 12.12.2025 and there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and again it was listed on 26.12.2025, there was no representation. Even today, there is no representation for the appellant.
2. In view of the same, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR Dt.22.01.2026 SR