1 2026:CGHC:24732 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.Cr.C No.5305 of 2026 Amit Verma S/o Late Virendra Verma Aged About 30 Years R/o Ward No.9, Verma Mohalla, Bhathapara, Chakarbhatha, P.S. Chakarbhatha, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, P.S. Chakarbhatha, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Non-applicant ____________________________________________________ For Applicant :Mr. Kunwar Lal Sahu along with Mr Chandra Kumar, Advocates. For Non-applicant/State :Mr. Shailendra Sharma, PL. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 18.06.2026 1. The Applicant has preferred this 1st Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Digitally signed by SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Date: 2026.06.19 11:39:33 +0530 2 connection with Crime No.291/2026 registered at Police Station – Chakarbhata, District Bilaspur (C.G.), for the offence under Section 34(2) of Excise Act. 2. As per the brief prosecution case, on 12.05.2026, the police personnel of Police Station Chakarbhatha received secret information that the present Applicant was in possession of liquor for the purpose of sale near the Railway Overbridge, Chakarbhatha. Acting upon the said information, the police conducted a raid and allegedly recovered 18 bulk liters of Mahua liquor from the possession of the Applicant. On the basis of the aforesaid allegations, the present offence has been registered against the present Applicant. Hence this application. 3. Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and is under incarceration since 13.05.2026. He further submits that no exclusive seizure of illicit liquor was made from the possession of the present Applicant and conclusion of trial is likely to take quite some time, therefore, he may be granted bail. 4. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the State opposes the bail application and submits that the present Applicant has previous criminal antecedents. It is submitted that one 3 criminal case registered under the IPC was, however, amicably settled before the Lok Adalat, while another case under Section 34(2) of the Excise Act is still pending against him and therefore, he does not deserve the benefit of grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Considering the submissions advanced by learned Counsel for the parties, the nature of allegations, the pre-trial detention, no exclusive seizure of illicit liquor was made from the possession of the present Applicant and further considering the likelihood of the trial taking considerable time, without further commenting anything on the merits of the case, this Court is of the considered opinion that it is a fit case to allow the application. Accordingly, the application is allowed. 7. Let Applicant- Amit Verma involved in Crime No.291/2026 registered at Police Station – Chakarbhata, District Bilaspur (C.G.), for the offence under Section 34(2) of Excise Act be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the 4 effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerbned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Priya