( 2026:HHC:38258 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.1187 of 2026 Date of decision: 09.09.2026 Puran Chand and Ors. ….Petitioners Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Ors ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on record communication dated 08.09.2026 along with copy of office order of even date, wherein, it has been stated that necessary orders in compliance to this Court’s judgment/order dated 08.09.2025, have been passed by the Deputy Director of School Education, District Kangra vide office order dated 08.09.2026. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the aforesaid office order dated 08.09.2026, if he still remains aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge September 09, 2026 (reena) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2