Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22313 (CHH)

SANDIP SINGH KAKKAD v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/927/2021 · 2026-06-18

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:25030 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 927 of 2021 1 - Sandip Singh Kakkad, S/o Late Satpal Singh Kakkad, Aged About 39 Years R/o Kakkad Complex, Sahdev Nagar, Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 2 - Manmeet Singh Bhatia, S/o Late Vareyam Singh Bhatia, Aged About 40 Years R/o Kohaka, Bhilai Nagar, District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners Versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate, District Rajnandgaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt Amarjeet Kour, W/o Shri Baldevsingh Kakkad, Aged About 63 Years R/o Kakkad Complex, Sahdev Nagar, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : None. For Respondent/State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Government Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice (Order on Board) 19.06.2026 1. At the very outset, it has been informed that counsel for the petitioner is on adjustment. 2. By filing the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):- “The applicants, therefore humbly and most respectfully prays that the Hon’ble Court kindly be pleased to call for the record of the court’s below and the order dated 20.07.2021 may SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 kindly be pleased to set aside and further please to direct the learned trial Court to permit the applicants to cross-examine the Handwriting expert as mention in the application filed by the applicant and further please to set aside the order of revision court 18/8/2021, in the interest of justice.” 3. As per the status report received from the office, the trial has already been concluded on 23.07.2022. In view of the same, the relief sought in the present petition has become infructuous as nothing survives for consideration in this petition by this Court. 4. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No orders as to costs. 5. Interim order, if any stands vacated. 6. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice s@if