Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:HHC:38263 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.995 of 2026 Date of decision: 09.09.2026 Jeevan Kumar ….Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Ors ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on record communication dated 06.08.2026 along with copy of office order dated 06.06.2026, wherein, it has been stated that representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided vide order dated 06.06.2026. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the aforesaid office order dated 06.06.2026, if he still remains aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge September 09, 2026 (reena) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement?