Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22306 (HP)

RATTAN CHAND AND OTHERS v. HRTC AND OTHERS

CMP-T/403/2026 · 2026-09-09

Sandeep Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RATTAN CHAND AND OTHERS Versus HRTC AND OTHERS CMP-T-403 of 2026 in EX.PT - 29 of 2023 09.09.2026 Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate vice Mr. S.P. Chatterji, Advocate, for the applicants/petitioners. Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the non-applicants/ respondents. While placing on record communication dated 08.09.2026, issued under the signatures of Regional Manager, HRTC, Mandi, enclosing therewith copy of order dated 08.09.2026, learned counsel for the respondents, states that mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed stands duly complied with. Having carefully perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, vis-à-vis mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed, this Court finds merit in the contention of learned counsel for the respondents and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that consequential benefits, if any, flowing from the aforesaid compliance, if not released, shall be released within a period of four weeks from today, failing which, petitioners would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 09, 2026 (Sunil)