( 2026:JHHC:22484 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7071 of 2026 ------ Md. Annu @ Seraj @ Md. Seraj Anwar, aged about 34 Years, S/o Late Alimudin Ansari, Resident of Village - Akhra Chowk Purani Ranchi, Post Office –G.P.O., Police Station –Sukhdoe Nagar, District –Ranchi (Jharkhand). … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahal Allam, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 29.07.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 06 of 2026 arising out of Sukhdeo Nagar P.S. Case No.600 of 25(N) registered for the offences punishable under sections 111(2(b) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 21(b)/22/29 of the NDPS Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale and purchase of brown sugar which is also known as heroin and from the co-accused person in total 139.558 gram of brown sugar was recovered; which comes under intermediate quantity. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only because he was the person, for whom the co-accused persons have stated, that they brought the brown sugar. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.01.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is next submitted that though charge sheet has already been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined so far. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, NDPS, Ranchi, in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 06 of 2026 arising out of Sukhdeo Nagar P.S. Case No.600 of 25(N) with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 29.07.2026 Sonu/